Chemotherapy Agents Used in the COVID-19 Pandemic and Previous Years in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients and Their Effects on Periodic Mortality: A Single-Center Experience

Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate chemotherapy agents used in the coronavirus disease-19 (CO?VID-19) pandemic and previous years and compare mortality rates of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who were receiving anticancer therapy. Methods: Patients were analyzed retrospectively in three different groups;the first group (December 1, 2017-May 31, 2018), the second group (December 1, 2018-May 31, 2019), and the pandemic period group (PPG) (December 1, 2019- May 31, 2020). Results: A total of 608 NSCLC patients were evaluated, 183 in the first group, 206 in the second group, and 219 in the PPG. Palliative anticancer therapy rates were 85.2% in the first group, 87.7% in the second group, and 74.4% in the PPG (p<0.001), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of the pre?ferred treatment agents. Mortality rate was found to be 21.9% in the PPG, and it was not significantly different from the other groups (p=0.959). The type of anticancer treatment agents had no statistically significant effect on mortality. The COVID-19-positive mortality rate among all NSCLC patients was 1.8% (4/219) in the PPG. Conclusion: COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly change mortality rates compared to previous years in this high?risk patient population.

Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Increased Mortality Among Patients with Cancer Receiving Systemic Anticancer Treatments?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mortality rates in patients receiving anticancer therapy in the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic period. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey, from December 2017 to May 2020. METHODOLOGY: Only patients who received chemotherapy and immunotherapy were selected and enrolled in the study. All patients (n=3,204) were divided into three groups, namely the first group (1st December 2017-31st May 2018, n=918), second group (1st December 2018-31st May 2019, n=1,147), and the pandemic period group (PPG) (1st December 2019-31st May 2020, n=1,139), according to the period during which they received anticancer treatment. The clinical and demographic characteristics and mortality rates of these three groups of patients were compared. RESULTS: The median age of the total of 3,204 patients was 61 (53-69). In this study, 51.1% (n=1,636) were females and 48.9% were males. The mortality rates were 13.5% (n=124) in the first group, 13.4% (n=154) in the second group, and 13.0% (n=148) in the PPG, respectively. Overall mortality rates did not differ among patients with cancer in the three different six-month periods analysed (p = 0.931). CONCLUSION: There was no unexpected increased in mortality rate among patients undergoing cancer therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to the previous years of the same timeline. No increase in monthly mortality rates among patients receiving anti-cancer treatment were demonstrated during the pandemic period.

Relationship between serum osteopontin levels and the severity of COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute inflammatory respiratory disease. Osteopontin (OPN) is a glycoprotein expressed in various cell types, such as bone, immune, smooth muscle, epithelial and endothelial cells. It also acts as a regulator of immune response. The aim of the present study was to reveal the place of serum osteopontin levels in predicting severity among patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This study included 84 patients, 43 female and 45 male. Patients were divided into 2 groups, group 1 non-severe group (n: 48), group 2 severe (n: 40). Demographic data, neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, white blood cell counts, albumin, procalcitonin, C­reactive protein (CRP) and OPN levels were recorded. The OPN levels and these inflammatory parameters of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in terms of gender (female/male 25/23 vs. 18/22) and platelet count (178 K/µL vs. 191 K/µL) between the groups (p > 0.05). Ages (57.7 ± 17.0 years vs. 71.4 ± 12.8 years), procalcitonin (0.07 vs. 0.24 ng/mL), CRP (17 vs 158 mg/l), neutrophil count (3.7 vs 5.64 K/µL), WBC counts (5.38 vs 7.85 K/µL) and number of deaths (0 vs 26) (p < 0.001). The OPN levels (98.5 vs 13.75 ng/mL, p = 0.002) were found to be statistically higher, in group 2 than group 1. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that OPN can be used to predict the severity in patients with COVID-19.

Efficacy of convalescent plasma according to blood groups in COVID-19 patients

Background/aim: In this study, we aim to investigate the efficacy of convalescent plasma (CP) according to blood groups (BGs) in the treatment of critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight critically ill and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Sakarya University, Medical Faculty were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who received anti-A antibody (Ab) containing CP (BG O and B) and those who did not receive CP containing anti-A Ab (BG A and AB). Results: Among the 28 patients, 13 patients received anti-A Ab containing CP (BG; B: 6, O: 7) and 15 patients did not receive anti-A Ab CP (BG; A: 13, AB: 2). Duration in ICU, the rates of mechanical ventilation (MV) support and vasopressor support, the case fatality rate, and the discharge rate were lower in patients who received CP containing anti-A Ab than not containing anti-A Ab CP. However, only the difference in the rate of MV support achieved statistically significance (P = 0.04) Conclusion: In our study, it was observed that the efficiency of CP without anti-A antibody was lower than that of plasma containing anti-A antibody, although it was not statistically significant. This result is thought to be due to the anti-A antibody's ability to block the ACE2 receptor. We believe that this hypothesis should be investigated in controlled studies with higher patient numbers.